<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FOSS on John Stowers</title><link>https://johnstowers.co.nz/tags/foss/</link><description>Recent content in FOSS on John Stowers</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://johnstowers.co.nz/tags/foss/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why Engineering and FOSS is Satisfying</title><link>https://johnstowers.co.nz/2008/03/28/why-engineering-and-foss-is-satisfying/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://johnstowers.co.nz/2008/03/28/why-engineering-and-foss-is-satisfying/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently came across the post; &lt;a href="http://drewyates.net/why-student-programmers-rant-about-business-students-with-ideas" rel="noopener"&gt;why student programmers rant about business students with ideas&lt;/a&gt;
. Putting my ideological belief in FOSS aside, I think it eloquently describes why I chose to return and pursue a PhD after a year spent studying engineering management (like an MBA - for those North American folks).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also think it is highly applicable to FOSS. Many successful FOSS projects are born from engineers, the &lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;decision to execute&amp;rsquo;&lt;/em&gt; has already been made. As the article mentions, _&amp;rsquo;leadership and the ability to make decisions _is &lt;em&gt;valuable, but only in groups with realizable ability to execute&amp;rsquo;&lt;/em&gt;. As a FOSS project evolves, the (normal?) combination of a BFDL and the constant freedom to fork keep the project relatively free of the ownership style disputes described in the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>